The matter of ‘ownership of goods’ and the eligibility to recover import VAT are intricately interlinked. This point was underscored in a recent case in the United Kingdom (UK). As a result of the decision of the UK tribunal in that case, the claimant was not able to recover the import VAT it had paid. Although this case concerned UK law, it nevertheless bore several similarities with previous decisions of the European Court of Justice (ECJ), such as in the Weindel Logistik Service case (C-621/19). This topic is therefore of relevance to all businesses involved in the import of goods, as our VAT & Customs Advisory experts explain in this article.
Piramal case: previously recovered import VAT to be repaid to HMRC
This case concerned Piramal Healthcare UK Ltd, a company involved in the import of goods into the UK for packaging. Piramal paid import VAT as it was named as the importer. Piramal had recovered import VAT on the import of goods, but the Tax & Customs authorities of the United Kingdom (HMRC) raised correctional assessments totalling £196,254 to claim this VAT back.
Piramal was only conducting a packaging process on the goods and its client remained the owner of those goods. HMRC argued that, as Piramal did not purchase the imported goods itself, it had no right to reclaim the import VAT it had incurred. The Tribunal agreed with HMRC, upholding the correctional assessments.
Relevance to UK and EU importers
The case is very important as it highlights HMRC’s policy on ‘ownership’, which is critical when determining who must be declared as the importer. As a result of Brexit, imports into the UK have increased and may pose a hidden challenge for many companies doing business in the UK. To read more about the UK case, please read this article by MHA, the Baker Tilly International member firm in the UK.
However, this case may also be seen as a cautionary tale for businesses involved in imports to the European Union. The case underlines the importance of a correct determination of ownership and the VAT consequences of an incorrect determination.
Stay alert!
The import of goods is a precision operation; one in which you need to be clear about your obligations. The Incoterms applied must be taken into account and businesses must ensure that their administrative records are correct. Declaring the incorrect party (i.e. a party other than the owner of the goods) as the importer when importing goods could result in import VAT becoming unrecoverable, forming a cost for the declared importer. These matters are often very difficult to resolve.
Would you like to know more about the customs and VAT obligations relating to the flow of goods in which your company is involved? Our experts would be happy to assist you. Please contact Baker Tilly VAT & Customs Advisory.
The legislation and regulations in this area may be subject to change. We recommend that you discuss the potential impact of this with your Baker Tilly advisor.
Other insights
-
Insight
What is in the EU Tax Omnibus proposal for direct taxation?
The long-awaited EU Tax Omnibus was presented on 24 June 2026. The plans contain various changes to current European directives and regulations. Our experts discuss the key proposals and the schedule for implementation.
-
Insight
Expected simplifications in the EU Tax Omnibus
The European Commission is set to publish a new proposal, as part of a broader agenda to simplify corporate income taxation in areas such as ATAD and Pillar Two and reduce administrative burdens across the EU. Ahead of the expected publication of the Tax Omnibus on 24 June 2026, our experts discuss a number of themes that may be included.
-
Insight
From parallel obligations to integrated opportunities: aligning Pillar Two, Transfer Pricing and other reporting
How can you avoid inconsistency, what overlap is there, and what opportunities for synergy and optimisation do we see in the multitude of international reporting obligations? Our experts discuss Pillar 2, Transfer Pricing and Public CbCR.